The dog next door wants to move in. He's been hungry. He's sometimes cold. He's left alone, sometimes for days, in the barn. We have two dogs, nine cats (we live in the country) - and a warm house where our pets are welcome. We'd like to give him a home. But he belongs to the farm next door.

He shows up whenever he's let loose - comes, peers in the windows, curls up for hours in a wind-sheltered corner near our door, waiting for us to relent and let him in. With us he has hope - because we've often let him in, including overnight.

It started in summer when he was just a pup. We took care of him for a couple of weeks when the people next door went away on a holiday. We offered, and his owners were glad we were there to look after him. But I think they already worried that our care would spoil him.

But that was in summer, when the kids were home from school. He had a lot to keep him with his owners.

Early in fall, he often came over, but would race home when the school bus went by.

Recently, he's stayed on our property and just watched it. It's cold out. The kids don't spend time outside, but he's stuck there.

Winter is coming. It's been here, with the temperature down to 17 below. It's mild again now, but won't stay that way.

Anyway, that's not the question. The question is: who should have the right to decide where the dog lives? The dog or the owners?

The question behind the question: do we have the right to own dogs and cats, or should they be allowed to make some decisions on their own - like where they want to live.

****

I'm not talking about their current legal rights. Those are obvious. Parents used to have the legal right to beat their children as often as they wanted, as hard as they wanted. I don't care about legal rights - those in fact change, in a democracy, as the general values of a society change. So now children have a legal right not to be beaten, and we have a legal right to birth control, divorce, etc. - because our values have changed.

Our values are based on what we believe is truly right - not legally, but morally, ethically, inherently. What intrinsic rights, we ask ourselves, should people have, children have, animals have, based on who we are, who they are?

I don't like (too soft a word) the slaughterhouse system - it offends my sense of what is right for animals. Trucks rattle past our place - open slats on the side. There's a pig farm a couple of kilometers away - enclosed, no sight or sound of what's inside. Then one quick trip through the outdoors. And a squealing death. I don't want to be part of it.

I stopped eating land animals and birds long ago. It did not feel right to me.

****

And now again, it does not feel right that the dog next door should be stuck where he doesn't want to be.

This question - should dogs and cats have some say in where they live? - may sound absurd to you.

But it used to be considered normal for people to own other people. Now it's unthinkable for many of us.

I remember reading, and later teaching, The Woman Warrior, by Maxine Hong Kingston. There's a passage describing a traditional Chinese delicacy. A live monkey is screwed into place in a table with a hole neatly carved for the top of its skull to show above the table surface. The monkey's body presumably dangles underneath. The skull is sawed open, and the brain - apparently delicious - is eaten. At some point, the monkey dies.

I've taught the book. What stood out for you, I ask my students (college and university level). One after another, they bring up this passage and shudder.

Also interesting is that the author writes the passage - the tone is so casual - as if unaware that her description might horrify current Western sensibilities. Perhaps this did not occur to her, though she grew up in the United States - just as many North Americans are not horrified by the slaughterhouse system (but do want to make sure they don't have to face it).

****

Times change, customs change. The delicacy of one time is the atrocity of another.

The dog next door isn't enduring atrocities. He'd just rather be indoors, than in an unheated barn with only cows for company. He has been skinny, but no one was intentionally starving him.

Plus, the life his owner wants for him is better than that of many city dogs - where, at present, many people are not horrified at the stultifying lives of millions of animals. City dogs - many get two short walks a day, long hours of solitude, and a minimum of attention in the evening. Many have no contact with other animals. You call that a life?

Here, I hear other dogs in the distance howling at night. They, like the dog next door, must be outdoors - or why howl? (They're far away enough that, fortunately, we only hear them when we're outdoors.)

****

Recently the owner asked that we stop letting the dog into our home. In this case, he is probably outside his legal rights. The dog comes onto our property of his own free will. We've never held him captive. (It's the owner who does that.)

The dog is roaming less and less these days - increasingly locked in the barn. We are the ones learning the lesson: the dog will be punished if comes near our place. So we had better not be nice. It's not worth it in terms of the cost to the dog.

****

I keep coming back to my question. What rights should animals have?

And, in the meantime, how should we deal with this specific dog? Do we turn our back on him?

There are no definite plans. My partner has been away for a few weeks. Before he left, he was unwilling to come with me and talk with the owner, though like me he cared about the dog. Now he is more willing. We know that the owner thought, when he got the puppy, that it would turn into a nice burly husky-like guard dog. It didn't. It's more like an overgrown terrier. We've thought of offering to find him a dog closer to what he intended to get. I've also thought of asking if we can buy the dog from him.

****

Pets, ownership, slavery. I'm not suggesting that owning people is the same thing as owning animals. I am suggesting that we have a lot of thinking to do about what's right, when it comes to animal rights.

signed,

Elsa
December 17, 2006

copyright © Elsa Schieder 2006
publishing house - FlufferDuff Impressions 2006

****

top of page

Click here to share dog stories, animal stories, ideas about animals

As for me, I've always - gut level - cared about how animals were treated.
Here's a childhood memory. It's from when I was seven and was given
a child's version of the Bible by some well-meaning friends of my parents.
It's also on how we may know, deep inside ourselves, when something is wrong
even if no one has told us it's wrong:

I'm seven and I utterly know
THIS IS WRONG.

Much more recently I wrote a book for preteens. It's about
a thirteen-year-old girl and ... an invisible dog.

The Fluffers Book -
or Caro Carolina, Geela Gribbs,
and Fluffers the Invisible Dog

****

PERHAPS MOST IMPORTANT FOR ANIMAL LOVERS
WHO WANT TO TRAVEL WITH PETS,
MY PARTNER AND I HAVE PET-FRIENDLY VACATION RENTAL HOMES:
http://www.holiday-vacation-rentals-plus.com/
DOGS WELCOME. CATS WELCOME. OTHER PETS, PLEASE CHECK.

Provence holiday vacation - villa with pool

Montreal vacation rentals - apartment, condo, home

Quebec countryside - Laurentian chalet, Eastern Townships cottage

****

top of page

For more on Animal Rights and More, here's my first encounter
with my inner moral voice. It had to do with animals and god.
I was seven, and inside me I knew what was right and what was wrong.

For The Fluffers Book, click here.
The Fluffers Book - Caro Carolina, Geela Gribbs,
and Fluffers, The Invisible Dog.
Animal rights and more.

For a "favorite" stupid opinion, Stupid Opinion #One,
click here.

For Elsa's creativity blog, on the writing of these pieces,
click here.

Animal Rights and More.
The dog next door wants to move in. Whose dog is it?
Dog animal rights. Animal liberation right vs human right.
Animal rights and abuse. The Idea Emporium asks:
what is ethical with pets?

Questions - on rage, hatred, narcissism, empathy, caring, peace.
Good thinking and analysis. Logic plus emotion.
The Idea Emporium - facts, ideas, conclusions.
Plus stupid opinions exposed.

THE IDEA EMPORIUM EXPLORES: ANIMAL RIGHTS AND MORE,
ANIMAL RIGHTS AND ABUSE, ANIMAL LIBERATION RIGHT, VIEWS ON ANIMAL RIGHTS,
PET OWNERSHIP AND SLAVERY, ANIMAL RIGHTS AND WELFARE, ANIMAL RIGHTS CASE,
ANIMAL RIGHTS VERSUS HUMAN RIGHTS, ANIMAL HAVE RIGHT, ANIMAL RIGHTS AND MORE
IDEA * EVALUATION * CONCLUSION * INSIGHT * COMMENTARY * CONTROVERSY * INTELLECTUAL
THOUGHT OF THE DAY * PERCEPTION * PERSPECTIVE * DATA * INFORMATION *
OPINION PIECES * LOGICAL THINKING * CRITICAL THOUGHT * INTELLECTUAL LAZINESS * IDEA

___________________________________________

comments, responses, further thinking, more ideas
__________________________________________

---

more ...

 

 

THE IDEA EMPORIUM
A CELEBRATION OF GOOD THINKING

THE IDEA EMPORIUM
NO HOLDS BARRED THINKING

THE IDEA EMPORIUM
LOOK AT ANYTHING, ASK ANYTHING

LOOK ANYWHERE

PLUS, LOOK AT THE JOURNEY

 

 

"It is a fact readily acknowledged,
that for humans,
an idea is much more powerful
than a fact."

 

WHEN I HEARD THAT,
I HAD A EUREKA MOMENT.
YES, I HAD SEEN THAT SO OFTEN.

 

SOME OF US ALREADY LOVE GOOD THINKING.

BUT GOOD THINKING IS POSSIBLE
FOR ALMOST ALL OF US,
JUST LIKE EVEN A COUCH POTATO
CAN GET INTO SHAPE!

SO, FOR THE THINKERS
AND THE POTENTIAL THINKERS

CLICK HERE
TO SUBSCRIBE 
FREE UPDATES

 

 

 

 

 

 

SUBSCRIBE
TO FREE UPDATES

Opt-in for Updates
NEWSLETTER

 

 

 

 

top of page

 

 

site design, site construction - Elsa Schieder
copyright © Elsa Schieder, 2006-2008 - all rights reserved
copyright © elsas-word-story-image-idea-music-emporium.com, 2006-2008 - all rights reserved
an all round creative space, creativity emporium and creativity match space
CLICK HERE TO CONTACT

Elsa
of
elsas word story image idea music emporium.com